• Enter your e-mail

RSS

Round the Square

It’s not your content… it’s that you don’t care.

by Meg | August 31st, 2010

Back when I started writing for the Web about nine years ago, before I joined the team at Sametz Blackstone, nobody really talked about “content.”

Words were either “copy” or “text” — or if they were published via a blog platform, they were “weblogging.”

Essentially, you wrote what your client wanted, and that was that. Testing methods were fairly archaic, and a profound lack of search competition meant even awkward sentence structure generated results.

The words we write for client websites now are still often just called “copy.” And weblogging is now “blogging.”

But now our clients want to talk about content, too.

Let’s get this straight: website copy and blogs are forms of content and always were, but the definition of content has blown up; it now serves as the umbrella term for everything you say about yourself or whatever it is you’re talking about, anywhere you say it, whether you use text, images, or a variety of other media.

If you post something somewhere folks can see it?

Content.

Now, I don’t actually want to get into what content is or isn’t, or  what it means to have a strategy for it. There are approximately 80 bajillion (excellent and not-so-excellent) articles and posts about those topics, all at your Googletips.

I’m more stuck on WHY all those articles are necessary.

Certainly…

…so we’re madly in flux, with multiple channels and venues and variables in play. People want to get heard for every reason under the sun — but somewhere along the line, they’ve figured out that the people who snag eyes and ears have something called great content.

There it is again: Content! You need content! Content is king! It’s a brave new world, right?

So you go to all the trouble of writing and posting and tweeting and “Facebooking” a million things, and then…. nothing.

Huh? I thought content was important?

Well, it is.

But something else is more important.

While the way we communicate and share has evolved and expanded (and some might say, exploded!), one thing hasn’t changed at all: the most successful individuals / companies / organizations / boy bands are the ones who provide their audience, fans, customers, consumers, and clients with exactly what they want, whether in terms of their products, services, or messages (content!).

And maybe a good portion of the population doesn’t want it…  but someone does.

Sometimes it happens by accident, and a little bit of kismet turns an idea into a sensation. But more often than not, someone took the time to figure out what’s needed or what’s wanted, and what works — whether via research, trial and error, evolution, or good questions, posed in the right directions.

Sure, this might seem like a lot of trouble when you’ve got something to say, but before you do, ask yourself: do you care?

Not in a touchy-feely, “hug it out” kind of way, mind you — but in a “does this matter to anyone but me?” way.

Successful content — about whatever, for whomever, on whatever platform, and to whatever end — requires the same thing any successful venture does: that you know what others care about, and that you demonstrate that knowledge by providing it for them (and not just what you wish they’d wanted in the first place).

Or, if they don’t know they care yet, figuring out the way in through the things they do care about.

If you have no idea what your audience is looking for, or how they’re reacting to what you’re putting out now… and you’re not so much trying to find out?

Your content won’t be successful.

If you don’t care about giving people something they’ll value — but rather what you value, because it’s really, really important?

Your content won’t be successful.

If you can’t figure out how your goals align with those of your audience or you’re not working to strengthen any alignments you’ve found?

Your content won’t be successful.

If you’re not paying attention to the other people who talk about the same stuff you do?

Your content won’t be successful.

If you’ve come up with incredibly clever taglines and fantastic copy and informative posts that perfectly embody everything you are and you honestly think everyone else will love it, too, because you took so much time doing it... but you don’t verify that with anyone else?

Your content won’t be successful.

Face it: you can have the most UX-friendly structure! and author-friendly CMS! and a great messaging architecture! and keywords that seem bang-on! and the most search enging-optimized content for those keywords! and the best authors posting super often! and writing that shoots like laser beams from the screen to zap the eyes of your readership… but unless it’s what matters to your audience?

Your. Content. Won’t. Be. Successful.

If someone has to beg you to care about what the people you’re speaking to want to hear — that you should want to provide them with value, that you should be meeting a need, or at least a want — you’ll never get where you mean to go.

So work on caring first — with all the open-eyed listening and asking and noticing and research and responding and adjusting that entails — and content second.

And see where that gets you. Besides everywhere… and far.

Categories: Digital Media, Strategy and Management

Comments (4)

to our website


Five Years Ago…

by Jeff | August 30th, 2010

Being a Digital Media Developer allows me to really enjoy the “The Five Years Ago Game,” an exercise in which I try to think up as many everyday 2010 things as I can that five years ago either did not exist or meant something different. These can be everything from proper nouns to phrases and slang, or even broad concepts. Given the absurdly dynamic nature of how we access and use the Internet, sometimes I feel like I can play for hours.

Here are a few I’ve recently come up with:

In August of 2005:

  1. YouTube’s company headquarters consisted of a small office on top of a pizzeria.
  2. Gmail was still invite-only.
  3. There was no such thing as an iPhone, and the phrase “mobile apps” would’ve elicited strange looks.
  4. Using the term “Blu-Ray” meant you were strictly an insider.
  5. High School Students couldn’t use Facebook (not until September, anyway).
  6. Twitter was just a word used in semi-common colloquialisms (e.g. “I’m all atwitter!”).
  7. Movies were overwhelmingly “2D.”
  8. Windows Vista had just been announced.
  9. Saying “I’m a Mac” may have gotten you committed.
  10. “Social Media” likely meant going out to the movies with friends.
  11. MySpace was still at least sort of hip.
  12. Consumer processors were almost entirely single-core (Pentium 4!).
  13. Apple still used their own processors.
  14. People were using Firefox 1, only recently changed from “Firebird.”
  15. Kindle just meant “to catch fire.”

Care to join in? Post yours in the comments! And don’t feel restricted to just technology….

Categories: Digital Media, Outside the Square

Comments (0)

to our website


The Nostalgia of Old Media

by Matt | August 27th, 2010

turntable-camera-reel-reel

There’s absolutely nothing like holding an old black and white family portrait in your hands. Weathered and battered, maybe a little musty-smelling. There’s also nothing like holding a 40-year-old vinyl record in your hands, pulled out of the sleeve while taking a moment to admire the artwork and track listing, then placing it on the turntable, letting the needle drop every so gently on it.

While you may not share in either of these two experiences, I KNOW you can relate to something like it. These are the tangible elements of media that are fading away in technology’s wake. I’m not getting ink or lead smeared on the right side of my hand as I draft this post. No, I’m giving my fingers a workout as they type feverishly on my keyboard. Click, click, clicking away (and not in the cool typewriter sounding way).

Vinyl records have been able to make a significant comeback. People love the experience and thought of vinyl. But I fear for poor photographers and the seemingly ill-fated return of film, and for recording engineers and the return of analog tape in the recording studio. These beautiful mediums are lost due to the extreme cost benefits of using digital methods to capture the art.

Even as a tech-heavy guy, I worry as I snap photos on my phone or digital camera and dump them onto a hard drive that might fail in a year or two. (This is why you BACK. UP. folks!) I also worry as I burn a CD of an intangible set of mp3s, wondering how long that CD will last as it gets kicked around the center console of my car.

But what can we do?

As technology rapidly advances, we are quickly drifting away from being able to experience these tangible events and occurrences in our lives. While our smartphones, laptops, and digital cameras are making life much easier, they’re also killing the seeds of nostalgia. I really don’t think the next generation is going to get the same nostalgic feeling from swiping through .jpgs on their iPads as I do when holding a musty black and white photo.

Do you?

Categories: Digital Media, Outside the Square

Comments (2)

to our website


One day left to vote on SXSW panel proposals… and here’s ours!

by Meg | August 27th, 2010

That’s right — just one day left to vote on SXSW panels! Head here to vote right now.

Our contributed panel proposal, “Scratch Your Niche! How Digital Dimensionality Builds Influence,” brings together:

You can read more about what the panel’s all about at the link above, but here’s a quick peek:

“Influence based on “digital dimensionality”—a coordinated presence across four dimensions—can expand your potential audience, and influence, to almost infinite proportions. In this session, you’ll see real-life examples of how both individuals and organizations have used the digital dimensionality to advance their goals…and learn how you can, too.”

To learn more — and to vote! — just head to our SXSW PanelPicker page!

Categories: Branding, Digital Media, Outside the Square, Strategy and Management

Comments (0)

to our website


Two great tastes?

by Eric | August 26th, 2010

LA 175552.jpg

Brand mergers aren’t always as easy as peanut butter + chocolate

A few weeks ago I was traveling back to the heartland, flying on a Continental plane. Reading pretty much every page of the in-flight magazine (I forgot to bring a book), I came across this Chairman’s Letter, in which Jeff Smisek called the Continental–United airlines merger “a merger of equals.” The “world’s most comprehensive network” will be “[f]lying under the United name with the Continental livery, logo, and colors,” he continued. That sounds simple enough! How hard could that have been? (In another statement, Continental spokeswoman Christen David said, “This combination is a true merger of equals bringing together the best of two great organizations. Accordingly, the marketing brand combines brands of both companies.”) Would that it were so easy.

If you’ve ever been involved with any kind of merger between two brands, you know it’s not at all easy, regardless of either party’s relative brand or economic strengths. There’s rarely a “right” answer to any single question. Say what you will about how imaginary or ephemeral the effects of branding are, brands and brand identities immediately become partisan battleflags when they’re threatened with annihilation. Something has to come out on top, which means something else doesn’t—i.e., loses—and no one likes to lose.

An excellent article by Julie Johnsson in the LA Times (you can find it elsewhere, too) investigates many of the brand issues tied up in the merger. It compares the merger to a wedding, but it’s more like two parents creating a child—and disappearing. We’ll be able to see their characteristics in the new creature, but in a novel mix. Each company spent a lot of money investing in the brands it has today, and they shouldn’t leave behind any more equity than they have to. The new company can’t afford to start from scratch. More than just choosing a logo, there is an array of symbolic and practical challenges to meet. Will the new airline (for in reality it will be a new airline) invite you to “Work hard. Fly right”? Will it still be “time to fly”? Or will its main message be something new altogether? For seasoned travelers who tend to develop loyalties, the colors, messages, and jingles are emotionally freighted. And the 80,000-strong company has to throw out a lot of stationery (and brochures, and websites, and sign)…oh, and repaint all the planes.

To be sure, there’s a lot more than branding that will decide how the new airline comes out the other side of this transition. But if the new company is a thoughtful steward of its emerging brand, the brand can help the company—

From a branding perspective, “a merger of equals” is the worst possible case. King Solomon wouldn’t be able sort it out. In this case, two famous logos went in, and neither walked out. There is no solution that won’t engender complaints about who lost. Kevin Masi, a Chicago branding expert, is quoted in Ms. Johnsson’s article: “Rebranding is an opportunity and requirement to communicate to the marketplace.” That’s exactly right. The new company has to do it, and if they stick to their guns (and do everything else people expect an airline to do well) they will build a strong brand, and this moment will become yet another footnote in their corporate history—remembered as a case study only by design and marketing types.

Categories: Branding

Comments (2)

to our website


Air type

by Alex | August 25th, 2010

Walking to the T the other day, I had the opportunity to grab a few frames of some impressive, aeronautical typography.
Five aircraft, flying in unison, drawing bitmapped type in the sky with a precision that—adjusted for scale—rivals the accuracy of many desktop printers. Cool.
I don’t know much about sky-writing–but think about the variables. The aircraft are likely flying at well over 100mph, and there’s wind, and they have to take perspective into account—which is particularly impressive, considering that that they’re flying in circles over the city, rather than flying in a straight line.
Aside from being impressed by the technological aspect of the performance–and it was certainly a performance, most people on the crowded sidewalk stopped to look, I heard a number of mumbled ‘I’m sorry’s'–the type itself was crisp and clean; engineer’s type. Type rationalized for use at altitude and speed.
But then nature and entropy take over. What was pristine becomes distressed; air currents expand and warp the letters so that they are transformed from crisp dashes to soft cotton balls; from the hard edge of technology to the (on that day) gentle corrosion of nature.

Walking to the T the other day, I had the opportunity to grab a few frames of some impressive, aeronautical typography.

Five aircraft, flying in unison, drawing bitmapped type in the sky with a precision that—adjusted for scale—rivals the accuracy of many desktop printers. Cool.

I don’t know much about sky-writing, but think about the variables. The aircraft are likely flying at well over 100 mph, and there’s wind, and they have to take perspective into account—which is particularly impressive, considering they’re flying in circles over the city, rather than flying in a straight line.

Aside from being impressed by the technological aspect of the performance, and it was certainly a performance (most people on the crowded sidewalk stopped to look; I heard a number of mumbled “I’m sorry’s”), the type itself was crisp and clean. Engineer’s type. Type rationalized for use at altitude and speed.

But then nature and entropy take over. What was pristine becomes distressed; air currents expand and warp the letters so they are transformed from crisp dashes to soft cotton balls; from the hard edge of technology to the (on that day) gentle corrosion of nature.

Beautiful.

Categories: Design, Outside the Square

Comments (0)

to our website


Social Media and Education: a SMBNH&ME recap

by Tamsen | August 24th, 2010

smb logoTo answer your first question: “SMBNH&ME” stands for “Social Media Breakfast New Hampshire and Maine.”

What’s that you, ask? Well, Social Media Breakfast was founded as a way for people involved with (or even just curious about) social media to get together to meet and learn. The location-based groups meet on varying schedules, usually with a specific topic in mind.

Last Friday, the groups from New Hampshire and Maine joined forces to cover the topic of social media and education—and Meg and I took a road trip to take part. (The tweet transcript can be found here and here.)

The event itself was a testament to both new technologies and the power of social media-fed relationships: due to some last-minute cancellations, one speaker presented via Skype, and I was asked by my friend and Social Media Breakfast New Hampshire Founder Leslie Poston to pinch-hit with her to answer attendee questions on social media and education (I worked in higher ed for eight years before joining Sametz Blackstone Associates).

Up first was Tucker Kimball from Gould Academy who talked about what he and Gould have learned from their forays into social media. His four “rules”:

  1. Publish, publish, publish – Keep up a steady stream of content, tailored to what’s finding traction among your audiences
  2. Respond – Interact with those who are interacting with you (sounds basic, but so many institutions don’t!)
  3. Don’t speak institutionally – Tucker told the story of the lacrosse coach whose personal engagement with folks on Twitter led to a matriculated student (and much-needed lacrosse attackman!)
  4. Social, but don’t forget media – Use a variety of platforms, and make sure there’s content that goes beyond mere conversation

We also thought it was interesting that Gould’s upcoming redesign of their website will funnel people in via content-specific microsites (athletics, arts, etc.), rather than driving people to a main site first. A sign of trends to come?

Hans Mundahl, who teaches Media Productions at New Hampton School, used live video streaming (Skype!) to discuss how NHS uses live video streaming themselves, both to produce student-run live webcasts and to live-stream select athletic events (something that’s apparently been a great for building alumni interaction and involvement).

The two Q&A sessions—one with just Leslie and me, and the other with Tucker and Hans as well—covered a variety of topics, from the legalities around posting student images (media releases at a minimum; check FERPA guidelines) to getting students to engage with social tools as classroom aides (I suggested enlisting students in choosing and building what they’d want and need) to whether or not to centralize institutional profiles and streams (general consensus was to keep streams separate, but coordinate through a central office).

Our thanks to Leslie and Amanda (the doyenne of SMBME) for a great event!

Categories: Digital Media, Outside the Square

Comments (2)

to our website


Is that recycled logo good news… or just old news?

by Michael | August 20th, 2010

iStock_000007210772Medium

It’s become a ubiquitous little symbol, and maybe so much so that our eyes pass over it without a thought.

Postcards from the cable company, magazines, catalogs, even your daily newspaper—all likely carry the original recycled mark or the logo of one of the associated advocacy organizations (FSC, SFI, among others). Each has its own unique significance (amount of recycled content, whether it includes post-consumer fiber, if wind power was used in the manufacturing process, etc.).

But what does it mean to you?

We know that a strong, clear brand is one that resonates with your customers and supporters. And if environmental stewardship is important to you, it should be an important message to send to your followers.

I often encourage our clients to include some version of a recycled logo, or even language that spells out things like how many trees have been saved because of the use of recycled paper (talk about a good story to tell!). Sometimes they haven’t necessarily cared about that message themselves, but the reaction they’ve gotten from their constituents makes them sit up and think differently.

How can we, together, make old news new again? The environment is ours to take care of, and we’re all in it together, as they say. Being green is becoming a way of life, despite what Kermit the Frog once said.

Is environmental stewardship important to you? Does it make a difference in your decisions about what to buy, who to support, and who to engage?

Categories: Branding, Design, Outside the Square

Comments (0)

to our website